The effects of cryotherapy on neuromuscular function
Paper instructions:
1) Literature Review (4000 + 10%), to assess the ‘quality’ of articles recommended by your supervisor and/or selected by yourself, using a selected critical appraisal tool (see examples on BREO). It is suggested that between 9 and 12 well chosen papers should be sufficient for the purpose of this assessment. Your literature review should be structured as follows:
a. Study Selection (where applicable): indicate the papers identified for you by your supervisor and describe how you selected any additional papers for appraisal
b. Quality Assessment: provide a ‘score’ [descriptive assessment] of each paper; you will need to define your ‘scoring system’. For example, you may wish to scale your readings as:
i. Poor, Moderate, Excellent;
ii. Weak, Fair, Average, Good, Superior; or,
iii. 1 – ‘of little or no credibility’ to 10 – ‘excellent design, analysis and discussion; very valuable’.
c. Review: Compare/contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the papers, culminating in a statement about whether all the papers broadly agree or differ
d. Conclusion: provide a conclusion following on from c, which summarises the overall state of evidence in the field
e. References

ORDER TODAY YOUR PAPER WITH SIMILAR INSTRUCTIONS AND WE WILL WRITE YOUR PAPER FROM SCRATCH