Blog

Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance

Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance

design, and other elements and to explore the application of the evidence they provide in different scenarios and settings. It is of paramount importance to correctly identify the type of research methods used in the study—quantitative or qualitative, or a mixture of both—and to evaluate the study to ensure those methods are high-quality, valid, reliable, and accurate. Consequently, doctoral professionals must develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific, important elements of both quantitative and qualitative research studies. Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill.

Preparation
Review the media pieces in Weeks 1–3, focusing on the EBP process, the PICO(T) process, and the important step of critically appraising research evidence.
Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.
Dorleijn, D. M. J., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Reijman, M., Kloppenburg, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., Bindels, P. J. E., . . . Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2018). Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: A 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 875.
Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education. Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443.
Locate the following tools, found in Appendix B in your Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare textbook. You will use these tools to complete the appropriate rapid critical appraisal for each study. Choose the tool that matches the methods and design of each study.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), page 711.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence, pages 715–716.
Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your completed executive summary and both general overviews and critical appraisals to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assignment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Instructions
Write a paper in which you:

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Complete a rapid critical appraisal of each study.
Write an executive summary that compares the two studies.
Document Format and Length
Your document should be 4–5 pages in length, including the overviews, rapid critical appraisals, and executive summary.

Supporting Evidence
Include at least two resources, other than the course textbook, to support your critical appraisals. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format for each study, the critical appraisal tools, and other resources used.

Assignment Grading
The following requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Include the study’s purpose, methods, design, results, and any other aspects of the study you think are noteworthy.
Consider how the study contributes to the scholarly literature.
Evaluate the quality of each study, using the appropriate rapid critical appraisal tool (RCA).
Create a table or other organized format for your answers to the questions on the RCA tool for each study.
What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?
Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance, and the practical application of results (evidence) in a health care setting.
Consider the following questions to guide the comparison of these studies in your executive summary:
Which study provides the best overall evidence? What elements in the study led you to this conclusion?
Which study provides subjective information that could be integrated to make positive changes to services, processes, systems, or patient care?
What is the significance of each study’s results in a hospital setting? How do the results affect patients?
How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings? In the overall health care industry?
Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

The post Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill.

Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill.

Once you have searched and found relevant and timely research studies, the next step is to evaluate the quality of their methods, design, and other elements and to explore the application of the evidence they provide in different scenarios and settings. It is of paramount importance to correctly identify the type of research methods used in the study—quantitative or qualitative, or a mixture of both—and to evaluate the study to ensure those methods are high-quality, valid, reliable, and accurate. Consequently, doctoral professionals must develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific, important elements of both quantitative and qualitative research studies. Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill.

Preparation
Review the media pieces in Weeks 1–3, focusing on the EBP process, the PICO(T) process, and the important step of critically appraising research evidence.
Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.
Dorleijn, D. M. J., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Reijman, M., Kloppenburg, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., Bindels, P. J. E., . . . Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2018). Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: A 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 875.
Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education. Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443.
Locate the following tools, found in Appendix B in your Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare textbook. You will use these tools to complete the appropriate rapid critical appraisal for each study. Choose the tool that matches the methods and design of each study.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), page 711.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence, pages 715–716.
Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your completed executive summary and both general overviews and critical appraisals to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assignment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Instructions
Write a paper in which you:

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Complete a rapid critical appraisal of each study.
Write an executive summary that compares the two studies.
Document Format and Length
Your document should be 4–5 pages in length, including the overviews, rapid critical appraisals, and executive summary.

Supporting Evidence
Include at least two resources, other than the course textbook, to support your critical appraisals. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format for each study, the critical appraisal tools, and other resources used.

Assignment Grading
The following requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Include the study’s purpose, methods, design, results, and any other aspects of the study you think are noteworthy.
Consider how the study contributes to the scholarly literature.
Evaluate the quality of each study, using the appropriate rapid critical appraisal tool (RCA).
Create a table or other organized format for your answers to the questions on the RCA tool for each study.
What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?
Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance, and the practical application of results (evidence) in a health care setting.
Consider the following questions to guide the comparison of these studies in your executive summary:
Which study provides the best overall evidence? What elements in the study led you to this conclusion?
Which study provides subjective information that could be integrated to make positive changes to services, processes, systems, or patient care?
What is the significance of each study’s results in a hospital setting? How do the results affect patients?
How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings? In the overall health care industry?
Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

The post Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill. appeared first on superioressaypapers.

develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific

develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific

involves finding the best research evidence to support an intervention, which is integrated with patient preferences and values and professional expertise, and then implemented. Once you have searched and found relevant and timely research studies, the next step is to evaluate the quality of their methods, design, and other elements and to explore the application of the evidence they provide in different scenarios and settings. It is of paramount importance to correctly identify the type of research methods used in the study—quantitative or qualitative, or a mixture of both—and to evaluate the study to ensure those methods are high-quality, valid, reliable, and accurate. Consequently, doctoral professionals must develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific, important elements of both quantitative and qualitative research studies. Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill.

Preparation
Review the media pieces in Weeks 1–3, focusing on the EBP process, the PICO(T) process, and the important step of critically appraising research evidence.
Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.
Dorleijn, D. M. J., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Reijman, M., Kloppenburg, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., Bindels, P. J. E., . . . Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2018). Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: A 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 875.
Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education. Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443.
Locate the following tools, found in Appendix B in your Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare textbook. You will use these tools to complete the appropriate rapid critical appraisal for each study. Choose the tool that matches the methods and design of each study.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), page 711.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence, pages 715–716.
Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your completed executive summary and both general overviews and critical appraisals to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assignment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Instructions
Write a paper in which you:

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Complete a rapid critical appraisal of each study.
Write an executive summary that compares the two studies.
Document Format and Length
Your document should be 4–5 pages in length, including the overviews, rapid critical appraisals, and executive summary.

Supporting Evidence
Include at least two resources, other than the course textbook, to support your critical appraisals. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format for each study, the critical appraisal tools, and other resources used.

Assignment Grading
The following requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Include the study’s purpose, methods, design, results, and any other aspects of the study you think are noteworthy.
Consider how the study contributes to the scholarly literature.
Evaluate the quality of each study, using the appropriate rapid critical appraisal tool (RCA).
Create a table or other organized format for your answers to the questions on the RCA tool for each study.
What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?
Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance, and the practical application of results (evidence) in a health care setting.
Consider the following questions to guide the comparison of these studies in your executive summary:
Which study provides the best overall evidence? What elements in the study led you to this conclusion?
Which study provides subjective information that could be integrated to make positive changes to services, processes, systems, or patient care?
What is the significance of each study’s results in a hospital setting? How do the results affect patients?
How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings? In the overall health care industry?
Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence

The post develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies.

 

. Once you have searched and found relevant and timely research studies, the next step is to evaluate the quality of their methods, design, and other elements and to explore the application of the evidence they provide in different scenarios and settings. It is of paramount importance to correctly identify the type of research methods used in the study—quantitative or qualitative, or a mixture of both—and to evaluate the study to ensure those methods are high-quality, valid, reliable, and accurate. Consequently, doctoral professionals must develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific, important elements of both quantitative and qualitative research studies. Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill.

Preparation
Review the media pieces in Weeks 1–3, focusing on the EBP process, the PICO(T) process, and the important step of critically appraising research evidence.
Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.
Dorleijn, D. M. J., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Reijman, M., Kloppenburg, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., Bindels, P. J. E., . . . Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2018). Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: A 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 875.
Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education. Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443.
Locate the following tools, found in Appendix B in your Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare textbook. You will use these tools to complete the appropriate rapid critical appraisal for each study. Choose the tool that matches the methods and design of each study.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), page 711.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence, pages 715–716.
Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your completed executive summary and both general overviews and critical appraisals to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assignment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Instructions
Write a paper in which you:

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Complete a rapid critical appraisal of each study.
Write an executive summary that compares the two studies.
Document Format and Length
Your document should be 4–5 pages in length, including the overviews, rapid critical appraisals, and executive summary.

Supporting Evidence
Include at least two resources, other than the course textbook, to support your critical appraisals. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format for each study, the critical appraisal tools, and other resources used.

Assignment Grading
The following requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Include the study’s purpose, methods, design, results, and any other aspects of the study you think are noteworthy.
Consider how the study contributes to the scholarly literature.
Evaluate the quality of each study, using the appropriate rapid critical appraisal tool (RCA).
Create a table or other organized format for your answers to the questions on the RCA tool for each study.
What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?
Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance, and the practical application of results (evidence) in a health care setting.
Consider the following questions to guide the comparison of these studies in your executive summary:
Which study provides the best overall evidence? What elements in the study led you to this conclusion?
Which study provides subjective information that could be integrated to make positive changes to services, processes, systems, or patient care?
What is the significance of each study’s results in a hospital setting? How do the results affect patients?
How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings? In the overall health care industry?
Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

The post Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. appeared first on superioressaypapers.

How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings?

How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings?

Evidence-based practice involves finding the best research evidence to support an intervention, which is integrated with patient preferences and values and professional expertise, and then implemented. Once you have searched and found relevant and timely research studies, the next step is to evaluate the quality of their methods, design, and other elements and to explore the application of the evidence they provide in different scenarios and settings. It is of paramount importance to correctly identify the type of research methods used in the study—quantitative or qualitative, or a mixture of both—and to evaluate the study to ensure those methods are high-quality, valid, reliable, and accurate. Consequently, doctoral professionals must develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific, important elements of both quantitative and qualitative research studies. Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill.

Preparation
Review the media pieces in Weeks 1–3, focusing on the EBP process, the PICO(T) process, and the important step of critically appraising research evidence.
Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.
Dorleijn, D. M. J., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Reijman, M., Kloppenburg, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., Bindels, P. J. E., . . . Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2018). Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: A 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 875.
Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education. Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443.
Locate the following tools, found in Appendix B in your Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare textbook. You will use these tools to complete the appropriate rapid critical appraisal for each study. Choose the tool that matches the methods and design of each study.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), page 711.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence, pages 715–716.
Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your completed executive summary and both general overviews and critical appraisals to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assignment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Instructions
Write a paper in which you:

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Complete a rapid critical appraisal of each study.
Write an executive summary that compares the two studies.
Document Format and Length
Your document should be 4–5 pages in length, including the overviews, rapid critical appraisals, and executive summary.

Supporting Evidence
Include at least two resources, other than the course textbook, to support your critical appraisals. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format for each study, the critical appraisal tools, and other resources used.

Assignment Grading
The following requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Include the study’s purpose, methods, design, results, and any other aspects of the study you think are noteworthy.
Consider how the study contributes to the scholarly literature.
Evaluate the quality of each study, using the appropriate rapid critical appraisal tool (RCA).
Create a table or other organized format for your answers to the questions on the RCA tool for each study.
What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?
Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance, and the practical application of results (evidence) in a health care setting.
Consider the following questions to guide the comparison of these studies in your executive summary:
Which study provides the best overall evidence? What elements in the study led you to this conclusion?
Which study provides subjective information that could be integrated to make positive changes to services, processes, systems, or patient care?
What is the significance of each study’s results in a hospital setting? How do the results affect patients?
How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings? In the overall health care industry?
Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

The post How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Homework Help

Homework Help

Introduction
Evidence-based practice involves finding the best research evidence to support an intervention, which is integrated with patient preferences and values and professional expertise, and then implemented. Once you have searched and found relevant and timely research studies, the next step is to evaluate the quality of their methods, design, and other elements and to explore the application of the evidence they provide in different scenarios and settings. It is of paramount importance to correctly identify the type of research methods used in the study—quantitative or qualitative, or a mixture of both—and to evaluate the study to ensure those methods are high-quality, valid, reliable, and accurate. Consequently, doctoral professionals must develop a working knowledge of how to identify and critically appraise specific, important elements of both quantitative and qualitative research studies. Rapid critical appraisal tools assist in developing this skill.

Preparation
Review the media pieces in Weeks 1–3, focusing on the EBP process, the PICO(T) process, and the important step of critically appraising research evidence.
Review the following two quantitative and qualitative studies. You will describe the key elements of each study and complete a critical appraisal of each.
Dorleijn, D. M. J., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Reijman, M., Kloppenburg, M., Verhaar, J. A. N., Bindels, P. J. E., . . . Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2018). Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: A 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 875.
Howson, A., Turell, W., & Roc, A. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Qualitative outcomes in patient-directed education. Health Education Journal, 77(4), 430–443.
Locate the following tools, found in Appendix B in your Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare textbook. You will use these tools to complete the appropriate rapid critical appraisal for each study. Choose the tool that matches the methods and design of each study.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), page 711.
Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Qualitative Evidence, pages 715–716.
Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your completed executive summary and both general overviews and critical appraisals to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assignment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Instructions
Write a paper in which you:

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Complete a rapid critical appraisal of each study.
Write an executive summary that compares the two studies.
Document Format and Length
Your document should be 4–5 pages in length, including the overviews, rapid critical appraisals, and executive summary.

Supporting Evidence
Include at least two resources, other than the course textbook, to support your critical appraisals. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format for each study, the critical appraisal tools, and other resources used.

Assignment Grading
The following requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Describe the key elements of a research study.
Include the study’s purpose, methods, design, results, and any other aspects of the study you think are noteworthy.
Consider how the study contributes to the scholarly literature.
Evaluate the quality of each study, using the appropriate rapid critical appraisal tool (RCA).
Create a table or other organized format for your answers to the questions on the RCA tool for each study.
What evidence supports your assertions and conclusions?
Compare a qualitative and quantitative study’s quality, significance, and the practical application of results (evidence) in a health care setting.
Consider the following questions to guide the comparison of these studies in your executive summary:
Which study provides the best overall evidence? What elements in the study led you to this conclusion?
Which study provides subjective information that could be integrated to make positive changes to services, processes, systems, or patient care?
What is the significance of each study’s results in a hospital setting? How do the results affect patients?
How could the evidence found in each study be applied in different health care settings? In the overall health care industry?
Support main points, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

The post Homework Help appeared first on superioressaypapers.

8 Assessment Questions

8 Assessment Questions

Strategies Of Health Promotion Assessment Questions

The post 8 Assessment Questions appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Questions

Questions

answering this multiple questions

The post Questions appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Movie Critique

Movie Critique

board assignment, you will choose one of the listed public health movies to watch (And the Band Played On, Contagion, or Miss Evers Boys), and you will answer the questions assigned to the movie you chose. You will have to rent the movie to watch since I do not have any links to a free version for any of the movies listed. I think you may find the movie, “Miss Evers Boys” on Youtube.

You will upload your answers as a post in this discussion board forum. You will also respond to 2 of your fellow classmates’ posts on your opinion of the movie you chose.

Movie: And the Band Played On

Critical Thinking Assignment

the people and polities of the AIDS outbreak

  1. Why did CDC researchers wear respirators masks when researching the Ebola outbreak in Africa?
  2. Why did they burn the bodies?
  3. Recognition of the AIDS epidemic in this country began in the late ‘70’s in SF, LA and NY.  What clues, symptoms and opportunistic diseases were observed during that period that signaled the start of a new infectious disease?  Why did researchers find these factors baffling?
  4. “Since smallpox in India” – do some research to figure out how long ago Don Francis and Dr. _____  had worked together.  What is significant about smallpox?
  5. Why was Don Francis asked to join the epidemiology team?
  6. Keep track of the death rate (% death vs. number of cases) before the development of AZT and protease inhibitors.
  7. Who is Gaten Dugas and why was he labeled as “patient 0”?”  Estimated sexual encounters per year? __________ Speculate about the factors (personality, career) that contributed to Gaten’s unique contribution to the AIDS epidemic.
  8. List some of the early names for the disease.
  9. Would you recommend this movie to a friend? What scene or part of the storyline impact you the most from this movie?

Movie: Contagion

Critical Thinking Assignment

  1. Who is patient zero?
  2. Why did her husband not get infected?
  3. What was the role of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) in the film?
  4. What part does private industry play in fighting this epidemic?
  5. What is the name of the worldwide organization that deals with the outbreak?
  6. What role did social media play in the outbreak?
  7. What were the origins of this virus? (species origins)
  8. What were the modes of transmission of this disease?
  9. Would this virus be categorized as an emerging virus? Why?
  10. How realistic do you think this film was? Explain in a well-developed paragraph.
  11. Would you recommend this movie to a friend? What scene or part of the storyline impact you the most from this movie?

Movie: Miss Evers Boys Questions

  1. Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB)?
  2. Was informed consent obtained from the participants? How did the Government receive consent from the participants?
  3. Was there provision for anonymity or confidentiality for the study participants?
    4. Was the study participants coerced into participating in the study, if so, how was it done?
  4. What were the benefits and the risk for participating in the study?
  5. Were the participants provided opportunity to ask questions about the study?
  6. What was the role of the nurse in the study? Explain your answer and why you believe that was the role of the nurse.
  7. Write a brief self-reflection about the movie. What did you get from the movie, and how did the movie influence your thoughts about research and what are some suggestions you would give to Miss Evers?

The post Movie Critique appeared first on superioressaypapers.