Blog

Is that an appropriate role for a judge?

Is that an appropriate role for a judge?

Write a 2 – 5 page essay explaining the facts of the case and how the court ruled. What did Chief Justice Hecht say about the court’s reasoning in his majority opinion? What is a concurring opinion, and what did Justice Guzman say in hers? Note the unusual step taken by Justice Guzman in urging the Texas Legislature to take a look at the workers’ compensation law next year. Is that an appropriate role for a judge? Most important: If you had been on the Supreme Court, how would you have ruled and why? [Interesting note: You’ll notice it says “Justice Lehrmann did not participate in the decision” – it’s because she was sick with COVID-19. She’s now recovering)

 

 

Other Resources

Here’s where you can find the official court opinions: https://www.txcourts.gov/supreme/orders-opinions/2020/june/june-12-2020/ (Links to an external site.)

JDSupra explains the case: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/texas-supreme-court-clarifies-standard-48737/ (Links to an external site.)

Landline, a truckers’ publication, has a nice article about the case: https://landline.media/texas-supreme-court-rules-on-workers-compensation-wrongful-death-case/ (Links to an external site.)

BusinessInsurance.com has this article: https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20200615/NEWS08/912335117/Exclusive-remedy-bars-family-from-suing-in-Texas-truck-driver%E2%80%99s-death-Mo-Vac-Ser

The post Is that an appropriate role for a judge? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

how might the Ideal Experimenter effectively be persuaded to conform to non-utilitarian standards of experimental practices?

how might the Ideal Experimenter effectively be persuaded to conform to non-utilitarian standards of experimental practices?

Read Aaron Ridley’s article “Ill-Gotten Gains: On the Use of Results from Unethical Experiments in Medicine” (Public Affairs Quarterly 9, no. 3 [July 1995]). Ridley examines the question of whether to make use of beneficial results that were obtained unethically from medical experiments performed on human beings. While many would probably say that such benefits should not be withheld, Ridley suggests it would be inappropriate to make use of such results. Given his article, address the following questions:

In your own words, explain Ridley’s argument based on utilitarianism and the Ideal Experimenter. According to Ridley, how might the Ideal Experimenter effectively be persuaded to conform to non-utilitarian standards of experimental practices?
In the end, do you think Ridley’s argument succeeds? Suppose some researchers performed experiments on children in which many of them suffered and died, but in the process, the researchers obtained information that could wipe out cancer. Should they use that information?
Ridley presents two reasons for not using the results of unethical experiments that he believes are not effective: respect and condoning. Why does he think these fail? Do you agree with him? If not, give an example in which you think an appeal to respect or condoning would be successful in arguing against the use of such results.
2 years ago

25.02.2020

The post how might the Ideal Experimenter effectively be persuaded to conform to non-utilitarian standards of experimental practices? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Compare and contrast federalism with a unitary system of government.

Compare and contrast federalism with a unitary system of government.

contrast federalism with a unitary system of government. Explain which one is used in the United States. lesson 1

 

Explain how a bill becomes law and detail the process. lesson2

 

Identify five cabinet departments and explain what they do. lesson 3

 

 

Detail how a case proceeds at the U.S. Supreme Court. lesson 4

The post Compare and contrast federalism with a unitary system of government. appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Explain which one is used in the United States. lesson 1

Explain which one is used in the United States. lesson 1

ederalism with a unitary system of government. Explain which one is used in the United States. lesson 1

 

Explain how a bill becomes law and detail the process. lesson2

 

Identify five cabinet departments and explain what they do. lesson 3

 

 

Detail how a case proceeds at the U.S. Supreme Court. lesson 4

The post Explain which one is used in the United States. lesson 1 appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Write a 2 – 5 page essay explaining the facts of the case and how the court ruled.

Write a 2 – 5 page essay explaining the facts of the case and how the court ruled.

Texas Judiciary Assignment

Texas has an unusual appeals process for judicial cases. District courts, where trials on matters of fact are held, are separated into different types according to the kind of cases they hear. You may notice when you vote in county elections, there are civil courts, criminal courts, probate courts, family courts, etc.

All these cases are appealed to a court that has jurisdiction in all of those areas. The First and Fourteenth Courts of Appeals, which meet in Houston, hear all kinds of criminal and civil cases.

After that, however, the process splits again. Criminal cases go to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Civil cases go to the Texas Supreme Court.

Go the the Texas Supreme Court website: http://www.txcourts.gov/supreme/ (Links to an external site.)

Use the “case search” feature to find a case called “Mo-Vac Service Company v. Estate of Fabian Escobedo. (18-0852 ),” decided on June 12, 2020.
Fabian Escobedo was a truck driver who worked for Mo-Vac Service Company, a company out of Dilley, Texas, with a fleet of tank trucks servicing oil and gas drilling sites. Escobedo was killed when his rig ran off the highway and rolled over. His estate sued Mo-Vac, saying his death was caused by his falling asleep at the wheel due to fatigue from being “forced to work grueling hours,” and presented pretty strong evidence of reprehensible behavior by Mo-Vac. Because Mo-Vac participates in the state’s workers’ compensation system, though, a 1916 law says that Escobedo’s benefits payable through workers’ compensation are the “exclusive remedy” for this unless it can be proven that Mo-Vac basically wanted the accident to happen and believed that the his death was substantially certain to result from it – a nearly impossible standard for a plaintiff to prove in a lawsuit like this.

Write a 2 – 5 page essay explaining the facts of the case and how the court ruled. What did Chief Justice Hecht say about the court’s reasoning in his majority opinion? What is a concurring opinion, and what did Justice Guzman say in hers? Note the unusual step taken by Justice Guzman in urging the Texas Legislature to take a look at the workers’ compensation law next year. Is that an appropriate role for a judge? Most important: If you had been on the Supreme Court, how would you have ruled and why? [Interesting note: You’ll notice it says “Justice Lehrmann did not participate in the decision” – it’s because she was sick with COVID-19. She’s now recovering)

 

 

Other Resources

Here’s where you can find the official court opinions: https://www.txcourts.gov/supreme/orders-opinions/2020/june/june-12-2020/ (Links to an external site.)

JDSupra explains the case: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/texas-supreme-court-clarifies-standard-48737/ (Links to an external site.)

Landline, a truckers’ publication, has a nice article about the case: https://landline.media/texas-supreme-court-rules-on-workers-compensation-wrongful-death-case/ (Links to an external site.)

BusinessInsurance.com has this article: https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20200615/NEWS08/912335117/Exclusive-remedy-bars-family-from-suing-in-Texas-truck-driver%E2%80%99s-death-Mo-Vac-Ser

The post Write a 2 – 5 page essay explaining the facts of the case and how the court ruled. appeared first on superioressaypapers.

What did Chief Justice Hecht say about the court’s reasoning in his majority opinion?

What did Chief Justice Hecht say about the court’s reasoning in his majority opinion?

Texas has an unusual appeals process for judicial cases. District courts, where trials on matters of fact are held, are separated into different types according to the kind of cases they hear. You may notice when you vote in county elections, there are civil courts, criminal courts, probate courts, family courts, etc.

All these cases are appealed to a court that has jurisdiction in all of those areas. The First and Fourteenth Courts of Appeals, which meet in Houston, hear all kinds of criminal and civil cases.

After that, however, the process splits again. Criminal cases go to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Civil cases go to the Texas Supreme Court.

Go the the Texas Supreme Court website: http://www.txcourts.gov/supreme/ (Links to an external site.)

Use the “case search” feature to find a case called “Mo-Vac Service Company v. Estate of Fabian Escobedo. (18-0852 ),” decided on June 12, 2020.
Fabian Escobedo was a truck driver who worked for Mo-Vac Service Company, a company out of Dilley, Texas, with a fleet of tank trucks servicing oil and gas drilling sites. Escobedo was killed when his rig ran off the highway and rolled over. His estate sued Mo-Vac, saying his death was caused by his falling asleep at the wheel due to fatigue from being “forced to work grueling hours,” and presented pretty strong evidence of reprehensible behavior by Mo-Vac. Because Mo-Vac participates in the state’s workers’ compensation system, though, a 1916 law says that Escobedo’s benefits payable through workers’ compensation are the “exclusive remedy” for this unless it can be proven that Mo-Vac basically wanted the accident to happen and believed that the his death was substantially certain to result from it – a nearly impossible standard for a plaintiff to prove in a lawsuit like this.

Write a 2 – 5 page essay explaining the facts of the case and how the court ruled. What did Chief Justice Hecht say about the court’s reasoning in his majority opinion? What is a concurring opinion, and what did Justice Guzman say in hers? Note the unusual step taken by Justice Guzman in urging the Texas Legislature to take a look at the workers’ compensation law next year. Is that an appropriate role for a judge? Most important: If you had been on the Supreme Court, how would you have ruled and why? [Interesting note: You’ll notice it says “Justice Lehrmann did not participate in the decision” – it’s because she was sick with COVID-19. She’s now recovering)

 

 

Other Resources

Here’s where you can find the official court opinions: https://www.txcourts.gov/supreme/orders-opinions/2020/june/june-12-2020/ (Links to an external site.)

JDSupra explains the case: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/texas-supreme-court-clarifies-standard-48737/ (Links to an external site.)

Landline, a truckers’ publication, has a nice article about the case: https://landline.media/texas-supreme-court-rules-on-workers-compensation-wrongful-death-case/ (Links to an external site.)

BusinessInsurance.com has this article: https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20200615/NEWS08/912335117/Exclusive-remedy-bars-family-from-suing-in-Texas-truck-driver%E2%80%99s-death-Mo-Vac-Ser

The post What did Chief Justice Hecht say about the court’s reasoning in his majority opinion? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Detail how a case proceeds at the U.S. Supreme Court. lesson 4

Detail how a case proceeds at the U.S. Supreme Court. lesson 4

Compare and contrast federalism with a unitary system of government. Explain which one is used in the United States. lesson 1

 

Explain how a bill becomes law and detail the process. lesson2

 

Identify five cabinet departments and explain what they do. lesson 3

 

 

Detail how a case proceeds at the U.S. Supreme Court. lesson 4

The post Detail how a case proceeds at the U.S. Supreme Court. lesson 4 appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Identify five cabinet departments and explain what they do. lesson 3

Identify five cabinet departments and explain what they do. lesson 3

contrast federalism with a unitary system of government. Explain which one is used in the United States. lesson 1

 

Explain how a bill becomes law and detail the process. lesson2

 

Identify five cabinet departments and explain what they do. lesson 3

 

 

Detail how a case proceeds at the U.S. Supreme Court. lesson 4

The post Identify five cabinet departments and explain what they do. lesson 3 appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Explain how a bill becomes law and detail the process. lesson2

Explain how a bill becomes law and detail the process. lesson2

system of government. Explain which one is used in the United States. lesson 1

 

Explain how a bill becomes law and detail the process. lesson2

 

Identify five cabinet departments and explain what they do. lesson 3

 

 

Detail how a case proceeds at the U.S. Supreme Court. lesson 4

 

The post Explain how a bill becomes law and detail the process. lesson2 appeared first on superioressaypapers.