Blog

Intel 305 Week 8

Intel 305 Week 8

Instructions:

Answer each of the following in approximately 200 words each.

  1. An element of the National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.
  2. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  3. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  4. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  5. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?

The post Intel 305 Week 8 appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war?

Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war?

Instructions:

Answer each of the following in approximately 200 words each.

  1. An element of the National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.
  2. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  3. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  4. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  5. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?

The post Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Answer each of the following in approximately 200 words each.

Answer each of the following in approximately 200 words each.

  1. An element of the National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.
  2. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  3. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  4. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  5. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?

The post Answer each of the following in approximately 200 words each. appeared first on superioressaypapers.

How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security?

How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security?

approximately 200 words each.

  1. An element of the National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.
  2. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  3. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  4. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  5. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?

The post How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.

Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.

following in approximately 200 words each.

  1. An element of the National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.
  2. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  3. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  4. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  5. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?

The post Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective. appeared first on superioressaypapers.

How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security?

How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security?

An element of the National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.

  1. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  2. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  3. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  4. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?

The post How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?

Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?

National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.

  1. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  2. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  3. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  4. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?

The post Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering

Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering

  1. An element of the National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.
  2. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  3. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  4. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  5. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows

The post Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering appeared first on superioressaypapers.

What sort of attributes would be absolutes?

What sort of attributes would be absolutes?

No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.

  1. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?
  2. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?
  3. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?
  4. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?

The post What sort of attributes would be absolutes? appeared first on superioressaypapers.