Blog

Please answer the question below. I want very focused replies. It is important to answer all the sub-questions and to include only relevant material. The essay should be approximately 2-3 double spaced pages in total. The Question: What events and social changes resulted in the legalization of birth control? Remember that it was not until the late 1930’s that the federal ban on birth control was lifted, ending the Comstock era. Although, condoms were legal, women needed men to cooperate, for them to be effective. After the ruling, cervical caps and/or diaphragms, also known as womb veils, became a possible method of birth control. Secondly, what were the political and social factors in the 1960’s that resulted in the expectation of sexual abstinence before marriage changing into the polar norm of sexual experimentation prior to marriage? Thirdly, what expectations about pre-marital heterosexual relations haven’t changed since World War 1 ? And, why? Or What might account for the culture’s reluctance to accept non-binary or transgender individuals or the never married ?

The post Please answer the question below. I want very focused replies. It is important t appeared first on nursingessayswriter.com.

Need to be able to post to a discussion forum – at least 1 paragraph for each question. Questions: 1. In what way (if at all) should the activities of professionals like doctors and lawyers be guided by moral considerations? Can you give specific examples. 2. What role does justice play in people’s interactions with their government? In your answer, think of the job of social workers and a liason between citizens and the government. 3. Summarize the job of an elementary school teacher in a short sentence. Should they teach practical life skills, or abstract reasoning? Or is there any tension in teaching both? 4. Is Artificial Intelligence possible? That is, is “intelligence” the sort of property that can reasonably be attributed to a machine? 5. Does a religious leaders knowledge of God (eg: preacher, rabbi) provide a unique insight into the human condition that might be valuable to alleviate suffering. Sorry for the short notice, class started today and this essay due before midnight. Nursing student also so I don’t have time for writing long essays. If this goes well, will use frequently, there are 2 of these due every week!

The post Need to be able to post to a discussion forum – at least 1 paragraph for each qu appeared first on nursingessayswriter.com.

Did Frankenstein name the Creature?

Provide each component clearly and distinctly.

Two paragraphs comparing two selected documents.
One thesis statement
One discussion question
Content Expectations:

Step ONE: Identify the nature of the source material. Which readings are primary or secondary sources? Are they fictional works or do they present any evident bias?
Step TWO: Choose TWO READINGS from the assigned documents to perform a compare/contrast analysis. Video material is not acceptable in this assignment.
If you choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source.
If you choose two primary sources, then compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues.
If there is only one assigned reading, then extract two meaningful examples instead of comparisons.
Step THREE: Draw TWO meaningful comparisons between the two documents that reveals important insight into the historical period/topic of the week. The comparison may be any similarity or difference, but should focus on explaining how it helps historians understand the past. Think about how and why things happened the way they did. Figure out what you think is the most significant SIMILARITY between the two passages.
Consider the author’s perspective (national origin, class, ideology etc) for each document.
STEP FOUR: If these documents were the source material for your research project, what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be? This should be no more than two sentences and cover the main idea that you would try to argue.
Ex. Using the works of Robespierre and St. Just, this paper will argue that the violence of the French Revolution was created by their interpretation of the needs of the French nation rather than their philosophical beliefs.
Be ambitious but with limits. Lay out a provable case that makes a strong a point, regardless of whether you are fully convinced that it is the case. You will be evaluated on the composition and effect of the ideas rather than the perfectness of the answer.
Step FIVE: Create one discussion question that you can propose to the class during seminar. It should be a ‘why’ problem that poses an issue for debate rather than demanding a specific factual answer. Ex. ‘Why didn’t Frankenstein name the Creature?” instead of “Did Frankenstein name the Creature?”
Do NOT use quotations or paraphrase the document. You may refer to specific passages but do not summarize the document. “ex. Where Thomas Paine talked about hereditary right, he was focused on the legitimacy of an absolute monarchy.” The paper should consist entirely of your own ideas and opinions about the sources using a compare/contrast approach. Therefore, citations should never be required. If you do quote/paraphrase then include citations.
READINGS-

1- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543copernicus2.asp

2- https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/micrographia-by-robert-hooke-1665#

3- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1630galileo.asp

The post Did Frankenstein name the Creature? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

discussion question

Two paragraphs comparing two selected documents.
One thesis statement
One discussion question
Content Expectations:

Step ONE: Identify the nature of the source material. Which readings are primary or secondary sources? Are they fictional works or do they present any evident bias?
Step TWO: Choose TWO READINGS from the assigned documents to perform a compare/contrast analysis. Video material is not acceptable in this assignment.
If you choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source.
If you choose two primary sources, then compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues.
If there is only one assigned reading, then extract two meaningful examples instead of comparisons.
Step THREE: Draw TWO meaningful comparisons between the two documents that reveals important insight into the historical period/topic of the week. The comparison may be any similarity or difference, but should focus on explaining how it helps historians understand the past. Think about how and why things happened the way they did. Figure out what you think is the most significant SIMILARITY between the two passages.
Consider the author’s perspective (national origin, class, ideology etc) for each document.
STEP FOUR: If these documents were the source material for your research project, what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be? This should be no more than two sentences and cover the main idea that you would try to argue.
Ex. Using the works of Robespierre and St. Just, this paper will argue that the violence of the French Revolution was created by their interpretation of the needs of the French nation rather than their philosophical beliefs.
Be ambitious but with limits. Lay out a provable case that makes a strong a point, regardless of whether you are fully convinced that it is the case. You will be evaluated on the composition and effect of the ideas rather than the perfectness of the answer.
Step FIVE: Create one discussion question that you can propose to the class during seminar. It should be a ‘why’ problem that poses an issue for debate rather than demanding a specific factual answer. Ex. ‘Why didn’t Frankenstein name the Creature?” instead of “Did Frankenstein name the Creature?”
Do NOT use quotations or paraphrase the document. You may refer to specific passages but do not summarize the document. “ex. Where Thomas Paine talked about hereditary right, he was focused on the legitimacy of an absolute monarchy.” The paper should consist entirely of your own ideas and opinions about the sources using a compare/contrast approach. Therefore, citations should never be required. If you do quote/paraphrase then include citations.
READINGS-

1- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543copernicus2.asp

2- https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/micrographia-by-robert-hooke-1665#

3- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1630galileo.asp

USE ANY TWO READINGS FROM THESE THREE TO COMPARE.

The post discussion question appeared first on superioressaypapers.

what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be?

Checklist: Do not use a standard essay format. Provide each component clearly and distinctly.

Two paragraphs comparing two selected documents.
One thesis statement
One discussion question
Content Expectations:

Step ONE: Identify the nature of the source material. Which readings are primary or secondary sources? Are they fictional works or do they present any evident bias?
Step TWO: Choose TWO READINGS from the assigned documents to perform a compare/contrast analysis. Video material is not acceptable in this assignment.
If you choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source.
If you choose two primary sources, then compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues.
If there is only one assigned reading, then extract two meaningful examples instead of comparisons.
Step THREE: Draw TWO meaningful comparisons between the two documents that reveals important insight into the historical period/topic of the week. The comparison may be any similarity or difference, but should focus on explaining how it helps historians understand the past. Think about how and why things happened the way they did. Figure out what you think is the most significant SIMILARITY between the two passages.
Consider the author’s perspective (national origin, class, ideology etc) for each document.
STEP FOUR: If these documents were the source material for your research project, what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be? This should be no more than two sentences and cover the main idea that you would try to argue.
Ex. Using the works of Robespierre and St. Just, this paper will argue that the violence of the French Revolution was created by their interpretation of the needs of the French nation rather than their philosophical beliefs.
Be ambitious but with limits. Lay out a provable case that makes a strong a point, regardless of whether you are fully convinced that it is the case. You will be evaluated on the composition and effect of the ideas rather than the perfectness of the answer.
Step FIVE: Create one discussion question that you can propose to the class during seminar. It should be a ‘why’ problem that poses an issue for debate rather than demanding a specific factual answer. Ex. ‘Why didn’t Frankenstein name the Creature?” instead of “Did Frankenstein name the Creature?”
Do NOT use quotations or paraphrase the document. You may refer to specific passages but do not summarize the document. “ex. Where Thomas Paine talked about hereditary right, he was focused on the legitimacy of an absolute monarchy.” The paper should consist entirely of your own ideas and opinions about the sources using a compare/contrast approach. Therefore, citations should never be required. If you do quote/paraphrase then include citations.
READINGS-

1- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543copernicus2.asp

2- https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/micrographia-by-robert-hooke-1665#

3- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1630galileo.asp

The post what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be? appeared first on superioressaypapers.

compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues.

Step ONE: Identify the nature of the source material. Which readings are primary or secondary sources? Are they fictional works or do they present any evident bias?
Step TWO: Choose TWO READINGS from the assigned documents to perform a compare/contrast analysis. Video material is not acceptable in this assignment.
If you choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source.
If you choose two primary sources, then compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues.
If there is only one assigned reading, then extract two meaningful examples instead of comparisons.
Step THREE: Draw TWO meaningful comparisons between the two documents that reveals important insight into the historical period/topic of the week. The comparison may be any similarity or difference, but should focus on explaining how it helps historians understand the past. Think about how and why things happened the way they did. Figure out what you think is the most significant SIMILARITY between the two passages.
Consider the author’s perspective (national origin, class, ideology etc) for each document.
STEP FOUR: If these documents were the source material for your research project, what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be? This should be no more than two sentences and cover the main idea that you would try to argue.
Ex. Using the works of Robespierre and St. Just, this paper will argue that the violence of the French Revolution was created by their interpretation of the needs of the French nation rather than their philosophical beliefs.
Be ambitious but with limits. Lay out a provable case that makes a strong a point, regardless of whether you are fully convinced that it is the case. You will be evaluated on the composition and effect of the ideas rather than the perfectness of the answer.
Step FIVE: Create one discussion question that you can propose to the class during seminar. It should be a ‘why’ problem that poses an issue for debate rather than demanding a specific factual answer. Ex. ‘Why didn’t Frankenstein name the Creature?” instead of “Did Frankenstein name the Creature?”
Do NOT use quotations or paraphrase the document. You may refer to specific passages but do not summarize the document. “ex. Where Thomas Paine talked about hereditary right, he was focused on the legitimacy of an absolute monarchy.” The paper should consist entirely of your own ideas and opinions about the sources using a compare/contrast approach. Therefore, citations should never be required. If you do quote/paraphrase then include citations.
READINGS-

1- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543copernicus2.asp

2- https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/micrographia-by-robert-hooke-1665#

3- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1630galileo.asp

The post compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues. appeared first on superioressaypapers.

choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source.

Do not use a standard essay format. Provide each component clearly and distinctly.

Two paragraphs comparing two selected documents.
One thesis statement
One discussion question
Content Expectations:

Step ONE: Identify the nature of the source material. Which readings are primary or secondary sources? Are they fictional works or do they present any evident bias?
Step TWO: Choose TWO READINGS from the assigned documents to perform a compare/contrast analysis. Video material is not acceptable in this assignment.
If you choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source.
If you choose two primary sources, then compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues.
If there is only one assigned reading, then extract two meaningful examples instead of comparisons.
Step THREE: Draw TWO meaningful comparisons between the two documents that reveals important insight into the historical period/topic of the week. The comparison may be any similarity or difference, but should focus on explaining how it helps historians understand the past. Think about how and why things happened the way they did. Figure out what you think is the most significant SIMILARITY between the two passages.
Consider the author’s perspective (national origin, class, ideology etc) for each document.
STEP FOUR: If these documents were the source material for your research project, what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be? This should be no more than two sentences and cover the main idea that you would try to argue.
Ex. Using the works of Robespierre and St. Just, this paper will argue that the violence of the French Revolution was created by their interpretation of the needs of the French nation rather than their philosophical beliefs.
Be ambitious but with limits. Lay out a provable case that makes a strong a point, regardless of whether you are fully convinced that it is the case. You will be evaluated on the composition and effect of the ideas rather than the perfectness of the answer.
Step FIVE: Create one discussion question that you can propose to the class during seminar. It should be a ‘why’ problem that poses an issue for debate rather than demanding a specific factual answer. Ex. ‘Why didn’t Frankenstein name the Creature?” instead of “Did Frankenstein name the Creature?”
Do NOT use quotations or paraphrase the document. You may refer to specific passages but do not summarize the document. “ex. Where Thomas Paine talked about hereditary right, he was focused on the legitimacy of an absolute monarchy.” The paper should consist entirely of your own ideas and opinions about the sources using a compare/contrast approach. Therefore, citations should never be required. If you do quote/paraphrase then include citations.
READINGS-

1- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1543copernicus2.asp

2- https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/micrographia-by-robert-hooke-1665#

3- https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1630galileo.asp

The post choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source. appeared first on superioressaypapers.

Write a 1000-1200 word paper

format the paper according to MLA guidelines (including an MLA header, a title, double-spaced, Times New Roman 12).

The Trojan War debate. Ancient Greeks firmly believed that the Trojan War took place: the various Gods and Goddesses played an active role, and the heroes Achilles and Hector literally existed. Centuries later, the Trojan War fell to myth, with later scholars arguing that it all was just an elaborate story created by inventive storytellers. What is true? Do some research into the question and decide what really happened. What lessons does this argument have for the modern period and our ability to interpret the past?

The post Write a 1000-1200 word paper appeared first on superioressaypapers.

• Assignment Purpose: As a family nurse practitioner, you will rely on your understanding of the pathophysiologic basis for a patient’s symptoms, physical findings and diagnostic results as part of the process of development of differential diagnoses for the clinical presentation. This case study is intended for you to show your understanding of the pathophysiology of a patient presentation. • Answer the questions separately and in the order presented, using the following headings per APA (Section 1, Section 2, Section 3) and so on with each “section” representing the corresponding question number. There is no need to restate the question. The “Section 1” heading is where question 1 will be answered and so on. A paper this short generally does not require level II headings, so if you choose to use them, use them very sparingly (they cost writing space). No separate introduction is required. The paper is to be a WORD document no more than 6 pages in length, excluding reference page and cover page. Double space your paper, using font size 12 and 1” margins on the paper. Use no (pre-set in WORD) before or after paragraph spacing (if you don’t understand this, please ask). Good writing, use of indention, paragraph breaks, synthesis, section to section transitions and APA mechanics do apply as well as APA style citations and references. -Must have nursing background/master level experience -Must be able to answer all questions in case study – Actual case study is in attachments

The post • Assignment Purpose: As a family nurse practitioner, you will rely on your unde appeared first on nursingessayswriter.com.