Assignment Two: PP Presentation | Nursing Essays Writer

“Americans already enjoy living standards that far exceed world averages. Do we have enough? Should we even try to produce more?”"Americans already enjoy living standards that far exceed world averages. Do we have enough? Should we even try to produce more?”

April 12, 2015

Consider the baggage check‐in of a small airline.

April 12, 2015

10 powerpoint slides(NOT INCLUDING TITLE AND REFERENCE SLIDE)

APA

SOURCES:3

Include some speaker notes

Assignment Two: PP Presentation

Instructions
Continuing to use the SHRM case study presented in the classroom, students will present a second power point presentation that builds on the information from the first presentation and applies some of the additional material assigned in the class. Students will conduct a SWOT Analysis of the current situation of the Human Resource function provided in the case study, propose at least three recommendations for changing the existing HR Domains (or specialist areas), describe if the recommendations add value to the areas of people, performance, information and/or work flow, and describe ways to institutionalize best practices in the recommended areas. Since HR departments communicate their Who, What and Why for their initiatives through a So That Statement, students will design an effective So That Statement for the HR function. The presentation ends with a summary or the conclusions for the paper and a Reference Page including at least two scholarly references. (in text citations are to be provided in the content of the presentation). Following is a sample outline for the presentation. You may add to or revise the order if you prefer. 1. Title Slide (include the title of the presentation, your name, university name, course number, professor’s name and date) 2. Introduction and Purpose for the Presentation 3. Summary of SWOT Analysis 4. Proposed Recommendations (at least three) to change or transform the HR function for more effectiveness 5. Recommendations for the HR function to add value to the areas of people, performance, information, and work flow, and description of how to identify ways to institutionalize best practices in these areas 6. Recommended HR So That Statement (this is the Who, What and Why of the HR function) 7. Justification for the Recommendations (why, based on your own opinion or support you can give from scholarly sources, the recommendations you have made are the ones that will help the organization) 8. Summary or Conclusions 9. Reference Page
End Date
Sep 21, 2014 11:59 PM

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: Assignment 2 Rubric (Power Point Presentation) 20%


Criteria	Level 5 Exceeds Expectations 5 points	Level 4 Meets Expectations 4.5 points	Level 3 Meets Some Expectations 3.5 points	Level 2 Does Not Meet Expectations 2 points	Level 1 Did Not Submit or Did Not Meet Minimum Expectations 0 points
Criterion 1 Proposed Recommendations (at least three). Identify if the recommendations add value to the areas of people, performance, information, and workflow, and description of how to identify ways to institutionalize best practices in these areas.	Recommendations are thorough, relevant and insightful, exceeding the expectations of the assignment. Each identification is made accurately, is through in description and ways to institutionalize best practices exceeds the expectations of the assignment.	Recommendations are generally thorough, relevant and insightful. Each identification is made accurately, is through in description and ways to institutionalize best practices meets the expectations of the assignment.	Some but not all the recommendations are thorough, relevant and/or insightful. Each identification is not made accurately, is not totally through in description and ways to institutionalize best practices meet some but not all the expectations of the assignment.	Recommendations are not thorough, relevant or insightful. Does not meet the expectations of the assignment.	Does not meet the minimum requirements of the assignment or not submitted.
Criterion 2 Recommended HR So That Statement and Summary of SWOT Analysis	HR So That Statement is clear, precise, links to the capabilities of the organization and includes Who, What and Why of the HR function. All elements of SWOT are thorough, insightful and demonstrates excellent knowledge.	HR So That Statement is generally clear, precise, links to the capabilities of the organization and includes Who, What and Why of the HR function. All elements of the SWOT are thorough, insightful and demonstrates good knowledge.	HR So That Statement is somewhat clear, precise, links to the capabilities of the organization and includes some or all of the Who, What and Why of the HR function. Some but not all of the elements of the SWOT are thorough, insightful and demonstrates good knowledge.	HR So That Statement is not clear or precise and/or does not link to the capabilities of the organization. Includes some but not all the Who, What and Why of the HR function. Not all elements of the SWOT are thorough, insightful but demonstrates some knowledge.	Does not meet the minimum requirements of the assignment or not submitted.
Criterion 3 Justification for Recommendations	Justifications are supported with very clear logic, relevant academic references are used and justifications are very convincing.	Justifications are supported with somewhat clear logic, academic references were included and justifications were mostly convincing.	Some but not all the justifications are supported with clear logic; academic references were included and justifications were mostly convincing.	Justifications are somewhat supported with logic, but academic references were not included and recommendations and justifications were not convincing.	Does not meet the minimum requirements of the assignment or not submitted.
Criterion 4 Academic Writing Style Including Introduction, Purpose Statement, Citations and References	Writes in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are provided in accurate APA format.	Generally writes in an error free manner, includes all the required elements, writing is mostly clear, logical, flows well and is convincing. Citations and references are provided in accurate APA format.	Meets some but not all the expectations for writing in an error free manner; meets some but not all the required elements, some writing is not clear, logical, and/or does not flow well and not totally convincing. Citations and references are not all provided in accurate APA format.	Does not always write in an error free manner, does not includes all the required elements, writing is not completely clear, logical, and does not always flows well and is not convincing. Citations and references are not provided in accurate APA format.	Does not meet the minimum requirements of the assignment or not submitted.
Overall Score	Level 5 Exceeds Expectations 18.1 or more	Level 4 Meets Expectations 16.1 or more	Level 3 Meets Some Expecations 14.1 or more	Level 2 Does Not Meet Expectations 8 or more	Level 1 0 or more
	18.1 to 20 Points	16.1 to 18 Points	14.1 to 16 Points	8 to 14 Points

Click here to place an order for a similar paper and have exceptional work done by our team and get A+results

Attachment

Human Resource Function
	Instuctions: For each function listed below on a scale of 1 to 5; how would you rate functions as discussed in the SHRM case study? You can only select one box in each row.
	HR Function	1-Barely meets administative needs	2-Meets administrative needs	3-Excels at Adminstration	4-Excels at Administration and has some strategic elements	5-Strategic Partner (Goal state)	Score the Gap (5 minus current rating)
	Example for measuring the gap			3			2
1	Human Resource Development/ Kellie Stephens
2	Compensation & Benefits/ Davis & Culbertson
3	Staffing/ Kim Wong
4	Safety & Security/ Jose Vasquez
5	Employee Relations/ Steven Wilson

Click here to place an order for a similar paper and have exceptional work done by our team and get A+results